12/9/2022 0 Comments The vatican tapes ending explainedBut a group of lawyers of the defense complained that portions of the video files of depositions were missing. Italian media reported earlier this month that prosecutors had fulfilled a court order to hand over missing evidence. He also ordered that the parties who request it can view the seized material, including the IT material, where it is now, and request a copy. 3, the prosecutors deposit all the documents, including the audio and video recordings of the interrogations, starting with those of Perlasca and the wiretapping. He also asked for clarification about Perlasca’s position in the trial: is he only a witness or is he also part of the criminal proceedings? Pignatone reiterated the court’s order for the video recordings of Perlasca to be deposited with court documents for access by defense lawyers. At the trial’s first hearing at the end of July, the lead prosecutor signaled his willingness to make copies of the interrogation tapes available, but afterward, he refused a specific request to do so made by the tribunal president. For the second interrogation, he brought his lawyer, but decided to make further statements without legal representation and eventually parted ways with his lawyer.Ī summary of Perlasca’s statements to prosecutors was provided to the defense attorneys, but videotapes were not. In his first interview with Vatican prosecutors, Perlasca volunteered information without the presence of a lawyer. For this reason, he was first questioned as a suspect, before he decided to collaborate with Vatican prosecutors. Perlasca was the director of the administrative office of the Secretariat of State for 12 years and the person who handled the London property affair. Alberto Perlasca had not been shared with them. And in particular, they pointed out that audiovisual recordings of the interrogation of Msgr. For example, the defense lawyers had pointed out that not all of the indictments had been filed - a necessary prerequisite for lawyers to prepare the defense. This was Pignatone’s way of trying to resolve some situations in the trial that risked rendering it invalid. 6, the president of the Vatican Tribunal, judge Giuseppe Pignatone, ruled in favor of requests by the defense to have prosecutors re-do the investigation into some of the charges and defendants. The prosecution has 10 defendants, with many different charges against them, most linked to the management of funds in the Vatican Secretariat of State, particularly to the purchase of a luxury property in London.Īt the trial’s third hearing on Oct. A Vatican judge’s partial turnaround at a hearing earlier this month is a significant plot twist in the finance trial that kicked off this summer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |